South Carolina Injury Lawyer Blog

Your Charleston personal injury attorneys read yesterday that the Mid-Town Atlanta dental practice that employed a nurse anesthetist sentenced to life plus 25 years in prison for sexually assaulting sedated and unconscious patients now faces a pair of civil lawsuits. According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the suits were filed by the parents of a 15-year-old girl and the other by an adult patient. The suits, filed in Fulton County state court, assert that the sexual assaults could have been prevented if the anesthetist had not been left alone with the patients and if the dental practice had taken proper steps to ensure the patients' safety while they were sedated. Further, the suits state the patients faced "an unreasonable risk" of harm.

According to the minor's suit, she arrived at the Marietta dental practice on July 29, 2009 for extensive surgery, left alone with the anesthetist and administered anesthesia, rendering her "unconscious, defenseless and completely dependent" on the anesthetist behind closed doors. The suit states the anesthetist lifted the minor's clothing and proceeded to record himself sexually assaulting the teen in her incapacitated state. Also according to the lawsuit, the 15-year-old, since the 2009 attack, "has suffered, and will continue to suffer for the rest of her life, physical and emotional injuries." Just three months earlier a similar such attack occurred at the same Marietta dental practice, according to the second lawsuit. The above-mentioned adult patient was awaiting surgery on April 29, 2009, and, again, was sedated, assaulted and videotaped while unconscious in the anesthetist's care.

Four months after the sexual assault on the teen (November 18, 2009), the anesthetist was arrested after a female visiting the dental practice discovered the anesthetist's cell phone attached beneath the bathroom sink with the phone's camera directed at the commode. Upon the phone's finding, police searched the device and found multiple images of women in the restroom. During his criminal trial, prosecutors described the anesthetist as a serial pervert who assaulted a total of 19 patients, including one during childbirth. To note, the anesthetist also worked at a Cobb Hospital. In addition, secret videotapes were discovered by authorities of women in the bathroom of his Marietta home. In an April 2011 bench trial, the anesthetist was found guilty on 34 charges that included sexual assault of a person in custody, aggravated sodomy, aggravated child molestation, and unlawful surveillance. In November he was sentenced to the aforementioned prison term and will not be eligible for parole for 55 years. Also at the bench trial, the anesthetist's criminal defense attorneys, at the request of their client, offered no defense and called no witnesses.

Continue reading " Dental Practice Faces Civil Suits Related to Former Employee's Sexual Assaults on Sedated Patients " »

A recent article found online by your Charleston personal injury attorney not only prompted a discussion of the case, but also the implications of aging as it relates to driving. The estate of a woman who died from serious injuries related to her being pinned between a concrete wall and a Cadillac operated has been awarded $525,000 in a New Jersey jury trial. According to an initial report, the 59-year-old woman was sitting in the front seat of the 2005 Cadillac STS, and was the driver's full-time home health aide. At the time of the serious car accident (2008), the male driver of the vehicle was 81-years-old and stems from the caregiver's getting out of the vehicle to direct the elderly gentleman into a parking spot at a local diner. After being struck and pinned the health aide was transported to a medical facility where she was subsequently pronounced dead.

Back in 2008 it was expected the 81-year-old man would be issued a court summons and requited to take a driver's license re-examination. See below for a more extensive look into elderly driving.

While both sides agreed that the elderly gentleman was negligent in the accident, at issue were the caregiver's job description, and whether the family could file suit. The defense argued that the caregiver, who was paid $100 a day to cook and clean, was an employee of the elderly man and died while in her capacity as his aid. Thus, because an employee injured or killed on the job is typically covered under workers' compensation, the caregiver's estate cannot sue an employer. By contrast, plaintiff's counsel likened the position to an independent contractor who would not be covered under workers' compensation. Therefore, the family is entitled to bring a wrongful death lawsuit. Further, plaintiff argued, since the elderly man did not expend payroll taxes and had no written contract with his caregiver, he was not her employer, and she was not covered under workers' compensation.

The two-week trial concluded with the eight-person jury siding with the plaintiff's argument, deeming the caregiver an independent contractor, and ultimately awarding the woman's family the aforementioned sum to the caregiver's family. While such sums are helpful in fulfilling a family member's last will and testament, as well as settling final expenses, no amount of money can return a mother and grandmother.

Continue reading " Wrongful Death Decision Prompts Discussion on Senior Citizens and Driving " »

Your Charleston accident lawyers at Howell and Christmas, LLC have discussed work accidents and on the job injuries in the past, but more often then not the injuries covered here are the result of an immediate accident, or due to a repeated work related action. But there exists another class of work related injury that may or may not develop long after the job is done; we're talking about exposure to hazardous materials that are believed to be the source of certain cancers and other forms of serious disease. Detailed below is a lawsuit concerning the same, and shows the difficulty of establishing a causal link between toxic exposure and a specific illness.

After a more than two-week long trial an Indiana jury has returned a verdict in favor of major aluminum producer Alcoa. A former miner who worked at the Squaw Creek Mine site from 1977 until its closure in the early 1990s filed the $12 million lawsuit. The suit claimed that Alcoa’s dumping hazardous substances at the site caused the former miner’s cancer of the bile duct, which is a rare form of liver cancer. The now 56 year-old man also spent countless hours fishing, hunting, hiking, and target shooting around the site starting as a young child. The lawsuit sought to recover and provide future medical costs, loss of income, pain and suffering.

Jurors were told by the plaintiff's attorney that the former miner's estimated past medical costs, including four major surgeries, was greater than $480,000; future medical expenses could exceed $800,000, with an additional $50,000 to provide for his wife's medical monitoring for signs of developing cancer; combined loss of income for the couple was estimated at $1.3 million; and plaintiff sought another $9.5 for intangible losses such as pain and suffering.

According to reports, large amounts of industrial waste were dumped into portions of the mine starting in the mid-1960s until 1979. Such waste included coal tar pitch, spent pot linings from its aluminum smelting and a sludge that contained chromium. Chromium has long been known to be toxic and carcinogenic (capable of causing cancer) in large amounts and in certain forms. Alcoa acknowledged the dumping but has disputed the toxicity of the waste, where the waste was dumped, and how much of it was dumped. Further, Alcoa insisted it was in full compliance with state regulations.

Continue reading " Jury Finds in Favor of Major Aluminum Producer in Cancer-Hazardous Waste Lawsuit " »

Escorted from the airport two days in a row for erratic and highly disruptive public behavior, a young woman was taken into custody on the second day for her actions. At the time she was 21 and in college, and had been involved in a serious auto accident the previous year, which either caused or exacerbated an existing mental condition--bipolar disorder. Upon being arrested, the young woman's mental state was called into question. Despite having spoken to the young woman's stepfather and mother by phone, both of which disclosed her psychiatric illness, the arresting officer and other state agents deemed her behavior unrelated to a diagnosed mental condition. Rather, most officers and other state actors felt she was either a) under the influence of drugs or b) simply disgruntled and difficult because of her being taken into custody.

The young woman was released from custody on a personal recognizance bond, after displaying some rather disturbing behavior. She was released into the early evening; near a public-housing project with an exceptionally high crime rate, without having her cellphone returned to her; she was dressed in a cutoff top with a bare midriff, short shorts, and boots; and she is a well off white woman while the immediate population is predominately black and not affluent. Thus, the young woman obviously stood out as unfamiliar with the surrounding environment, making her a potential target for crime. To boot, she was released into a neighborhood with many abandoned apartment buildings waiting to be demolished. Vacant apartments, like vacant buildings, render an area more dangerous as they are known to provide a haven for criminals, and, therefore, criminal activity.

While free in this particular downtrodden neighborhood the young woman came into contact with a group of 15-20 individuals. Several young men led her into an uninhabited apartment building a few blocks from the police station she was released. Court records state that the young woman was made aware of her precarious and unsafe situation by the group, and suggested she should leave. The young woman, however, was too confused to act on that advice. Five hours removed from police custody, a man forced the group from the apartment, and raped the young woman at knifepoint. In an effort to escape, or in a further act of assault, the young woman left the apartment through a window; seven stories above the ground below. She may have jumped. She may have been pushed or thrown. Although she survived the sexual abuse and overall horrific experience, she cannot say exactly what happened as she suffered a traumatic brain injury from the fall, permanently reducing her brain function to that of a child.

Continue reading " Facts of a Thought Provoking Case Outlined and NFL Team Pays Tribute to Inspirational Former Player " »